Supreme Court Set to Review Employment Discrimination Class Action Lawsuits

  • Over 100 Years of Experience

    Our dedicated attorneys have a reputation for success.

    Meet Our Team
  • Our Awards Set Us Apart

    Learn about our distinguishing awards & how this benefits you.

    What It Means For You
  • Client Testimonials

    Many satisfied clients have used Schwartz Perry & Heller.

    What They Have to Say
  • Request Your Consultation

    Contact our firm today to learn how we can help you.

    Get Started Now

Supreme Court Set to Review Employment Discrimination Class Action Lawsuits

The United States Supreme Court has agreed to review a major class-action gender discrimination lawsuit against Wal-Mart which may involve anywhere from 500,000 to 1.5 million women.

The case at issue originally involved six female Wal-Mart employees who brought gender discrimination claims regarding unequal compensation and failure to promote as compared to male employees. The case then began to grow into a major class action law suit which could potentially include 1 million current and former female Wal-Mart and Sam's Club employees.

The Supreme Court will not review the facts of the case and determine any liability, rather, its inquiry will be limited to whether such a large number of potential claims can be joined together in a single litigation.

The decision of the Court, which will likely be handed down in the Spring of 2011, is one that is eagerly anticipated by those with interests on both the employee and employer sides of employment litigation due to its potentially significant impact.

Contact Us

Schwartz Perry & Heller LLP
New York Employment Law Attorney
Located at: 3 Park Ave.,
27th Floor,

New York, NY 10016
View Map
Phone: (646) 490-0221
Local Phone: (212) 889-6565
Website:
© 2018 All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.