Female Boss Didn't Want a Woman Doing So-Called Man's Work

  • Over 100 Years of Experience

    Our dedicated attorneys have a reputation for success.

    Meet Our Team
  • Our Awards Set Us Apart

    Learn about our distinguishing awards & how this benefits you.

    What It Means For You
  • Client Testimonials

    Many satisfied clients have used Schwartz Perry & Heller.

    What They Have to Say
  • Request Your Consultation

    Contact our firm today to learn how we can help you.

    Get Started Now

Female Boss Didn't Want a Woman Doing So-Called Man's Work

Female Boss Didn’t Want a Woman Doing So-Called Man’s Work

Single mother of seven had stellar employment record before she was fired

Is there such a thing as “men’s work” and “women’s work?” Believe it or not, some people still think that’s the case.

Unfortunately, those attitudes may lead to gender discrimination in the workplace. Let’s take a look at a recent sex-based discrimination case and then discuss what it means to you.

Replaced with a man

Katie Mayes, a single mother of seven children, had worked at a WinCo grocery store for nearly seven years when she was awarded a new title: night-shift supervisor for the freight crew.

As part of her promotion, Mayes was required to hold a leadership role on the store’s safety committee. As in her previous roles at the store, Mayes received positive performance reviews and followed company rules, according to the store’s assistant manager.

However, things changed for Mayes when a new store manager – a woman named Dana Steen – took over.

Steen removed Mayes from the safety committee and replaced her with a male employee. When Mayes questioned her about the change, Steen allegedly replied that she thought a man would do a better job in that position.

Mayes complained to the assistant store manager. She says that he told her to “stay away” from Steen, because she didn’t like having a woman in charge of the freight crew.

Not long after that, Mayes says that Steen began criticizing her for not being able to come in on days off due to her childcare responsibilities. One time when Mayes explained that she couldn’t stay late because she had to pick up her children, Steen allegedly muttered “kids” and walked away.

Mayes asserts that Steen never spoke this way to Mayes’s male counterpart, even though he had similar childcare responsibilities.

Fired for supposed theft

One night, Mayes brought her crew a cake from the bakery’s “stale cart,” which contained items that were no longer salable. Mayes and her male counterpart both state that this was an allowed practice, as it helped to motivate the freight crew during busy stocking periods.

Near this same time, the bakery reported a theft of a cake from a display window. Steen ordered an investigation. It was determined that one of Mayes’s employees had taken the fresh cake, and that Mayes had taken a stale cake. Mayes told a loss-prevention representative that she had permission from management to take cakes from the stale cart.

Both employees were fired.

Mayes’s position was filled by a man who had been hired three weeks earlier. He had limited experience on the freight crew and no had prior supervisory experience with the company.

Because she was fired for “gross misconduct,” Mayes and her children were not eligible for health insurance coverage through COBRA, and Mayes was unable to collect pay for her unused vacation time.

Sued for discrimination

Mayes consulted with an attorney and sued the company for gender discrimination. Her attorneys argued that she was unfairly fired so that her manager could put a male employee in charge of the freight crew.

The company tried to have the case thrown out, arguing that Mayes had no evidence of sex-based discrimination. It also asserted that Steen could not have discriminated against Mayes because both were women.

A lower court initially agreed to dismiss the case, but Mayes appealed.

This time, Mayes was victorious. The appeals court allowed the case to proceed.

(The case discussed here is Mayes v. WinCo Holdings, Inc.)

Contact us for a consultation now

According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, federal law forbids sex-based discrimination when it comes to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or condition of employment.

If you feel that you’ve been discriminated against because of your gender, it’s wise to speak to an attorney to find out more about your rights under the law.

Call or email us today to discuss your unique situation.
Categories: Gender Discrimination

Comments

No Comments Posted

Contact Us

Schwartz Perry & Heller LLP
New York Employment Law Attorney
Located at: 3 Park Ave.,
27th Floor,

New York, NY 10016
View Map
Phone: (646) 490-0221
Local Phone: (212) 889-6565
Website:
© 2018 All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.