Can Woman Be Fired for Talking about Her Salary?

  • Over 100 Years of Experience

    Our dedicated attorneys have a reputation for success.

    Meet Our Team
  • Our Awards Set Us Apart

    Learn about our distinguishing awards & how this benefits you.

    What It Means For You
  • Client Testimonials

    Many satisfied clients have used Schwartz Perry & Heller.

    What They Have to Say
  • Request Your Consultation

    Contact our firm today to learn how we can help you.

    Get Started Now

Can Woman Be Fired for Talking about Her Salary?

Can Woman Be Fired for Talking about Her Salary?

What employees need to know about their rights under the NLRA

You suspect that you may be getting paid less than people in similar positions. You’ve brought the matter up with Human Resources only to be given vague answers that didn’t quite satisfy your concerns.

The only way to find out for sure is to have some candid talks with your colleagues. However, the company frowns on people talking about their compensation.

The question is, can you be terminated for talking about your salary?

Let’s take a look at what happened when one employee was fired for discussing her salary and then discuss workers’ rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

Fired over funds

Lynda Teare was a training coordinator at a surveying company. She believed that she wasn’t being paid on par with her colleagues, so she engaged in a few conversations to find out what other people were making.

However, management got wind of what Teare was up to. She was terminated for allegedly “harassing” other workers by asking them about their compensation.

Teare filed for unemployment. When the state unemployment office contacted her former employer, it was told that Teare was fired because she had openly discussed salaries, which was a “pet peeve” of the company.

Teare spoke to an attorney and filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board, the independent federal agency that protects the rights of private-sector employees to join together, with or without a union, to improve their wages and working conditions.

The case went to trial. An administrative law judge ruled that Teare’s former employer had violated the NRLA.

Under the NLRA, employers may not prohibit employees from engaging in discussions about rates of pay, pay increases, or perceived inequities in pay. The judge ordered the company to pay Teare $107,000 in back pay and lost benefits, and to reinstate her to her former position.

Teare declined to be reinstated.

(For more information, see Jones & Carter, Inc., and Lynda A. Teare.)

NLRA: Not just for union workers

People may mistakenly assume that the NLRA only applies to union employees, but that’s not the case. It also offers certain protections to non-union employees.

The NLRA is a federal labor law that protects private-sector employees’ rights to unionize, engage in collective bargaining, and take other collective actions, such as striking.

In addition, it protects the rights of non-union workers to engage in certain “protected activities,” including discussing the terms and conditions of employment, unless there is a legitimate business reason for prohibiting those conversations.

It’s important to note that employees in the railroad and airline industries are not covered by the NLRA, but many other employees are.

What it means to you

If you believe that your rights under the NLRA have been compromised, it’s a good idea to speak to an attorney.

Call or email us today to discuss your unique situation.

Categories: Employment Law

Comments

No Comments Posted

Contact Us

Schwartz Perry & Heller LLP
New York Employment Law Attorney
Located at: 3 Park Ave.,
27th Floor,

New York, NY 10016
View Map
Phone: (646) 490-0221
Local Phone: (212) 889-6565
Website:
© 2018 All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.