Can't Sit For Long? You May Have a Disability Under the ADA

  • Over 100 Years of Experience

    Our dedicated attorneys have a reputation for success.

    Meet Our Team
  • Our Awards Set Us Apart

    Learn about our distinguishing awards & how this benefits you.

    What It Means For You
  • Client Testimonials

    Many satisfied clients have used Schwartz Perry & Heller.

    What They Have to Say
  • Request Your Consultation

    Contact our firm today to learn how we can help you.

    Get Started Now

Can't Sit For Long? You May Have a Disability Under the ADA

In a case with particular relevance to those of us who spend our days sitting and staring at computers (especially attorneys!), late last month, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals recognized that an impairment that prohibits an employee for sitting for too long can be a disability under the ADA.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a federal law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees because they are disabled. It defines a "disability" as a physical or psychological impairment that substantially limits a major life activity. As a result, not every impairment is a disability. The New York Human Rights Law (NYHRL) and the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) all have significantly broader definitions of the term "disability" including relatively minor mental and physical impairments.

In this case, the employee, Carmen Parada, worked for Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A. Approximately six months after she started working for the bank, Ms. Parada fell and hurt her back. As a result, she no longer was able to sit for a prolonged period. According to one of her medical reports, she was able to sit for only 15 minutes before she has to stand.

Ms. Parada asked the bank for an ergonomic chair which she believed would have allowed her to perform her job. The bank did not respond to her requests so she asked again, this time offering to pay for the chair herself. When she still did not receive any response she told the bank she could not continue to perform her job without a new chair. When the bank's Operations Manager finally told Ms. Parada he would discuss her request when he returned from a business trip she complained to the Compliance Officer and requested a leave of absence. Ultimately, the bank fired Ms. Parada, claiming she failed to provide sufficient documentation to prove she was disabled and needed a medical leave, and declaring it considered her to have abandoned her job.

Ms. Parada sued, claiming the bank committed disability discriminatio in violation of the ADA, the NYHRL and the NYCHRL. However, the District Court dismissed her ADA claim, ruling she was not disabled under it based on an earlier case, Colwell v. Suffolk County Police Department. That case found a police officer who was unable to sit or stand for "too long" was not disabled for purposes of the ADA.

On appeal, the Second Circuit reversed. It distinguished Colwell by explaining the employee in that case was too vague about his physical limitations. It ruled that employees do not have to prove they are completely unable to sit to establish they are disabled with respect to the major life activity of sitting. Rather, the relevant question is whether the employee is substantially impaired in his or her ability to sit in comparison to the average person.

The court further explained that the ADA requires employers and courts to make that determination on a case-by-case basis. As a result, it would be improper to set a bright-line rule that only employees who are unable to sit at all are substantially impaired with respect to sitting. In doing so it recognized that, under the right circumstances, even an employee who merely cannot sit for an extended period time could be disabled under the ADA.

The court stated that "We certainly have never required that a plaintiff show that she is unable to sit at all. If a plaintiff offers evidence that she cannot sit for a prolonged period of time, she may well be disabled under the ADA, depending on her specific factual circumstances. Of course, we recognize that the inability to sit for even an abbreviated period of time… is more likely to be a substantial limitation of a major life activity than is the inability to sit for prolonged periods; few people are able to sit for hours on end without genuine discomfort." Parada v. Banco Industrial de Venezuela, C.A. ,

The takeaway: If you have issues with being able to sit for a prolonged period, you have a disability that entitles you to protection under the ADA, the NYHRL, and the NYCHRL.

Comments

No Comments Posted

Contact Us

Schwartz Perry & Heller LLP
New York Employment Law Attorney
Located at: 3 Park Ave.,
27th Floor,

New York, NY 10016
View Map
Phone: (646) 490-0221
Local Phone: (212) 889-6565
Website:
© 2018 All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.