Sexual Harassment Case Against Fast Food Chain Is Settled by E.E.O.C.

  • Over 100 Years of Experience

    Our dedicated attorneys have a reputation for success.

    Meet Our Team
  • Our Awards Set Us Apart

    Learn about our distinguishing awards & how this benefits you.

    What It Means For You
  • Client Testimonials

    Many satisfied clients have used Schwartz Perry & Heller.

    What They Have to Say
  • Request Your Consultation

    Contact our firm today to learn how we can help you.

    Get Started Now

Sexual Harassment Case Against Fast Food Chain Is Settled by E.E.O.C.

A sexual harassment lawsuit filed in September 2012, is being settled with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, against Panda Express, a Chinese fast-food chain, which manages and operates nearly 1,600 restaurants in 42 states across the United States. According to the lawsuit, a male supervisor subjected three female employees ages 17-19 to "unwelcome physical and verbal sexual conduct that was sufficient severe and pervasive to adversely affect the terms and conditions of the employment and created a hostile work environment." One of the victimized teenagers who protested the sexual harassment stated that her hours were cut and she was forced to resign. Another teen quit to void the verbal obscenities and sexual advances.

According to the settlement, Panda Express is required to implement anti-sexual harassment training measures including yearly sexual harassment training for all managers in the restaurant where the sexually harassing conduct took place, as well in all restaurants throughout the State.

Contact Us

Schwartz Perry & Heller LLP
New York Employment Law Attorney
Located at: 3 Park Ave.,
27th Floor,

New York, NY 10016
View Map
Phone: (646) 490-0221
Local Phone: (212) 889-6565
Website:
© 2018 All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.