Company Must Pay $65K After Assuming Disabled Man Couldn't Work as a Truck Driver

  • Over 100 Years of Experience

    Our dedicated attorneys have a reputation for success.

    Meet Our Team
  • Our Awards Set Us Apart

    Learn about our distinguishing awards & how this benefits you.

    What It Means For You
  • Client Testimonials

    Many satisfied clients have used Schwartz Perry & Heller.

    What They Have to Say
  • Request Your Consultation

    Contact our firm today to learn how we can help you.

    Get Started Now

Company Must Pay $65K After Assuming Disabled Man Couldn't Work as a Truck Driver

Company Must Pay $65K After Assuming Disabled Man Couldn’t Work as a Truck Driver

Job applicant already had 20 years of experience as a professional truck driver

Can a man who is missing an arm safely drive a truck? One hiring manager thought the obvious answer was no.

But Robert Kallgren, who had been an amputee since he was a teenager, had worked as a professional truck driver for over 20 years. However, when he applied to work for a new company, the hiring manager assumed that Kallgren was unqualified for the job.

After Kallgren filed a complaint of disability discrimination, the company decided to settle the matter rather than defend its actions in court. It must pay Kallgren $65,000 as part of that settlement.

This case raises some interesting questions about how people’s assumptions may play into workers’ rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Let’s talk about what it means to you.

Perception v. reality

When it comes to disabilities, perception can be a powerful thing. Hiring managers who are trying to assess someone’s fitness for a particular job are likely to make assumptions about any number of things.

Unfortunately, that can be especially true when it comes to disabilities. As in the case we mentioned above, a manager may assume that someone is unfit for a certain job based on perceived limitations.

However, the ADA requires that employees and job applicants be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Employers are obligated to engage in an interactive process with the person to determine if he or she is able to do the job, either with or without accommodation.

That process often involves discussing whether an accommodation can help the person complete the main duties of the job. Companies may generally not deny job accommodations unless they would cause an undue hardship to the business.

An undue hardship might include purchasing equipment that is prohibitively expensive or having to implement a procedure that would be disruptive to business operations. However, it’s important to note that purchasing assistive devices is generally considered to be a reasonable accommodation.

For more information on the case above, see EEOC v. Flying J Transport.

Contact us for a consultation now

If you feel that you’ve been subjected to unlawful discrimination under the ADA, it’s wise to speak to an attorney to find out more about your rights under the law.

Call or email us today to discuss your unique situation.

Comments

No Comments Posted

Contact Us

Schwartz Perry & Heller
New York Employment Law Attorney
Located at: 3 Park Ave.,
27th Floor,

New York, NY 10016
View Map
Phone: (646) 490-0221
Local Phone: (212) 889-6565
Website:
© 2017 All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.